I want to amend a bit the editing procedure we'll use for Sphere's API on the wiki. I want functions to be tagged with the earliest possible version of Sphere in which they appeared and if they're deprecated in 1.6 and later. You can probably use extra categories for both, but let's be consistent throughout.For pre-1.5, say its version is 1.1; 1.5 is 1.5, 1.6 is 1.6, and 1.7 (however alpha or beta it may still be) is 1.7. TurboSphere will be considered a version, and any functions marked as such will only consider the latest working version of TurboSphere until TS actually reaches at least Sphere 1.5 parity, then those after that will have TurboSphere version numbers.
[ Introduced in 1.0 | Removed in 1.6 onward; do not use! ]
As far as I'm concerned, go ahead and put them on there. Which articles? (Not like it matters much, all of them are useful.) Are they in HTML or wikisource? Might need to do some conversion there.
For pre-1.5, say its version is 1.1; 1.5 is 1.5, 1.6 is 1.6, and 1.7 (however alpha or beta it may still be) is 1.7. TurboSphere will be considered a version, and any functions marked as such will only consider the latest working version of TurboSphere until TS actually reaches at least Sphere 1.5 parity, then those after that will have TurboSphere version numbers.
About the wiki, would it be kosher for me to post some TurboSphere pages there?
Quote from: N E O on March 11, 2013, 10:53:54 pm...This sounds good to me, I think. You're saying that functions will be marked both for Sphere and TurboSphere, but only marked with a version for Sphere, and not have a 'version introduced' tag for TurboSphere, right?Also, once TS 1.0 (which should be on par with 1.5, or so I'm planning) is released I'll be moving to the X.Y version numbers for TS, too.
...
Should Functions go into API:Functions with Functions just redirecting to that, then?
I'll begin adding in the function pages I salvaged from ye olde wiki. Should function pages have a TOC? Some of the ones I saved do and some don't.On the topic of the wiki, some anti-spam control may already be in order...check the recent changes to see what I mean.